Compare Mazda 5 facelift vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 4
Variants
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0D 110
2.0D 143
2.4
2.4 AT
2.5D
2.8D AT
3.3
3.3 AWD
3.8
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
920 L / 32.5 cu-ft ~ 4130 L / 145.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
Passengers
7
7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Solid axle, Leaf spring
Tire Size
195/65 R15
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Minivan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Length
4505 mm / 177.4 in
Size | Width
1755 mm / 69.1 in
1997 mm / 78.6 in
Track Width | Front
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Wheel Size
15 in
16 in
Wheelbase
2750 mm / 108.3 in
3030 mm / 119.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Production
Availability
2008 ~ 2010
2001 ~ 2007
Reviews
Neofiliac score
38%
26%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Improved exterior design
- Very high cargo capacity
- Lots of interior space
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.