Compare Chrysler Grand Voyager 5 vs Seat Alhambra II vs Chrysler Voyager 4

Variants
2.4
2.8D 150
2.8D 163 AT
3.3
3.8 AT
1.4 TSI
1.4 TSI DSG
1.4 TSI Ecomotive
1.4 TSI Ecomotive DSG
2.0 TDI 115
2.0 TDI 136
2.0 TDI 136 DSG
2.0 TDI 140 4Drive
2.0 TDI 150 Euro6
2.0 TDI 150 Euro6 4Drive
2.0 TDI 150 Euro6 DSG
2.0 TDI 170
2.0 TDI 170 DSG
2.0 TDI 177
2.0 TDI 177 DSG
2.0 TDI 177 Euro6d 4Drive DSG
2.0 TDI 177 Euro6d DSG
2.0 TDI 184
2.0 TDI 184 DSG
2.0 TSI 200 DSG
2.0 TSI 220 DSG
2.4 147
2.4 147 AT
2.4 152
2.4 152 AT
2.5D
2.8D AT
3.3 AT
3.3 AWD AT
3.8
3.8 AWD

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
445 L / 15.7 cu-ft ~ 4080 L / 144.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
Passengers
7
7
Payload
545 kg / 1202 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Solid axle, Leaf spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Solid axle, Leaf spring
Turning Circle
12.0 m / 39.4 ft
11.9 m / 39.0 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1750 mm / 68.9 in
Size | Length
4854 mm / 191.1 in
4805 mm / 189.2 in
Size | Width
1995 mm / 78.5 in
Track Width | Front
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2919 mm / 114.9 in
2880 mm / 113.4 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.299
Towing Capacity
450 kg / 992 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1600 kg / 3527 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Reviews

Neofiliac score
30%
25%
27%
Pros
  • Very high cargo capacity
  • Lots of interior space
  • Good 0.29 drag coefficient
  • High cargo capacity
  • Very high cargo capacity
  • Lots of interior space
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Poor suspension setup
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • No in dependent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.