HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Mercedes B-Class W245 facelift vs Citroen Grand C4 Picasso vs Citroen C4 Grand SpaceTourer

Variants
B 150 CVT
B 170
B 170 CVT
B 180 CDI
B 180 CDI CVT
B 200
B 200 CDI
B 200 CDI CVT
B 200 Turbo
B 200 Turbo CVT
1.6 HDi 112 AT
1.6 HDi 109 6MT
1.6 HDi 109 5MT
1.6 HDi 109 AT
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 140 AT
1.6 150 AT
1.6 156 AT
1.6 120 Euro5
1.6 120
1.8 125
2.0 HDi 136 AT
2.0 HDi 150
2.0 HDi 150 AT
2.0 HDi 163 AT
2.0 140 4AT
2.0 140 6AT
1.2 PureTech 131
1.2 PureTech 131 AT
1.2 PureTech 131 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 131
1.5 BlueHDi 131 AT
1.6 BlueHDi 120 AT
1.6 BlueHDi 99
1.6 THP 165 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 150
2.0 BlueHDi 163 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
544 L / 19.2 cu-ft ~ 2245 L / 79.3 cu-ft
208 L / 7.3 cu-ft ~ 1951 L / 68.9 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
4.5 L / 4.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
54.0 L / 14.3 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
7
7

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.2 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1660 mm / 65.4 in
1638 mm / 64.5 in
Size | Length
4273 mm / 168.2 in
4590 mm / 180.7 in
4602 mm / 181.2 in
Size | Width
1777 mm / 70.0 in | 2035 mm / 80.1 in (mirror unfolded)
1830 mm / 72.0 in | 2100 mm / 82.7 in (mirror unfolded)
1826 mm / 71.9 in | 2117 mm / 83.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1971 mm / 77.6 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
1573.0 mm / 61.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1539.0 mm / 60.6 in
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
Wheelbase
2778 mm / 109.4 in
2728 mm / 107.4 in
2840 mm / 111.8 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.31

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Stroke
90.5 mm / 3.6 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score
18%
24%
21%
Pros
  • High cargo capacity
  • More interior space than the Picasso
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent interior space
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Rather uglier than the Picasso
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspension
  • Poor performance
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Basic suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.