Compare Seat Alhambra II vs Citroen Grand C4 Picasso vs Citroen C8
Variants
1.4 TSI
1.4 TSI DSG
1.4 TSI Ecomotive
1.4 TSI Ecomotive DSG
2.0 TDI 115
2.0 TDI 136
2.0 TDI 136 DSG
2.0 TDI 140 4Drive
2.0 TDI 150 Euro6
2.0 TDI 150 Euro6 4Drive
2.0 TDI 150 Euro6 DSG
2.0 TDI 170
2.0 TDI 170 DSG
2.0 TDI 177
2.0 TDI 177 DSG
2.0 TDI 177 Euro6d 4Drive DSG
2.0 TDI 177 Euro6d DSG
2.0 TDI 184
2.0 TDI 184 DSG
2.0 TSI 200 DSG
2.0 TSI 220 DSG
1.6 HDi 112 AT
1.6 HDi 109 6MT
1.6 HDi 109 5MT
1.6 HDi 109 AT
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 140 AT
1.6 150 AT
1.6 156 AT
1.6 120 Euro5
1.6 120
1.8 125
2.0 HDi 136 AT
2.0 HDi 150
2.0 HDi 150 AT
2.0 HDi 163 AT
2.0 140 4AT
2.0 140 6AT
2.0 HDi 163
2.0 HDi 163 AT
2.0 HDi 109
2.0 HDi 109 AT
2.0 HDi 120
2.0 HDi 136
2.0 136
2.0 136 AT
2.0 140
2.0 140 AT
2.2 HDi 128
2.2 HDi Biturbo 170
2.2 HDi Biturbo 170 AT
2.2 158
3.0 204 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
208 L / 7.3 cu-ft ~ 1951 L / 68.9 cu-ft
225 L / 7.9 cu-ft ~ 2948 L / 104.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
Passengers
7
7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1660 mm / 65.4 in
Size | Length
4854 mm / 191.1 in
4590 mm / 180.7 in
4727 mm / 186.1 in
Size | Width
1830 mm / 72.0 in | 2100 mm / 82.7 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1539.0 mm / 60.6 in
Wheelbase
2919 mm / 114.9 in
2728 mm / 107.4 in
2823 mm / 111.1 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.299
0.31
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
25%
24%
20%
Pros
- Good 0.29 drag coefficient
- High cargo capacity
- More interior space than the Picasso
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Basic suspension setup
- Rather uglier than the Picasso
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspension
- Some unreliable petrol engines
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- No independent rear suspensions
- Poor automatic transmissions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.