Compare BMW 2 Series Active Tourer F45 vs BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer F46 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 4 / Town & Country (RS)

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer F45

BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer F46

Chrysler Grand Voyager 4 / Town & Country (RS)

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer F45BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer F46Chrysler Grand Voyager 4 / Town & Country (RS)
Variants
214d
216d
218d
218d AT
218i
218i AT
220d
220d AT
220d xDrive AT
220i
220i AT
225i AT
225i xDrive AT
225xe xDrive AT
214d
216d
216d AT
216i
218d
218d AT
218d xDrive
218d xDrive AT
218i
218i AT
220d
220d AT
220d xDrive AT
220i
220i AT
2.4
2.4 AT
2.5D
2.8D AT
3.3
3.3 AWD
3.8

Reviews

Neofiliac score34%43%26%
Pros
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Lots of space inside
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Lots of space inside
  • Very high cargo capacity
  • Lots of interior space
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Somewhat ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Limited by MacPherson strut front suspension
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Basic suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.