Compare Ford Ranger (P375) Double Cab vs Mazda BT-50 II (UP/UR) Dual Cab vs Ford Ranger III Single Cab

Ford Ranger (P375) Double Cab

Mazda BT-50 II (UP/UR) Dual Cab

Ford Ranger III Single Cab

Ford Ranger (P375) Double CabMazda BT-50 II (UP/UR) Dual CabFord Ranger III Single Cab
Variants
2.2 TDCi 125 4x4
2.2 TDCi 130
2.2 TDCi 130 4x4
2.2 TDCi 150 4x4
2.2 TDCi 150 4x4 AT
2.2 TDCi 160
2.2 TDCi 160 4x4
2.2 TDCi 160 4x4 AT
2.2 TDCi 160 AT
2.5 4x4
3.2 TDCi
3.2 TDCi 4x4
3.2 TDCi Euro5 4x4
3.2 TDCi Euro5 4x4 AT
3.2 TDCi 4x4 AT
3.2 TDCi Euro5 AT
3.2
3.2 Euro5
3.2 4WD
3.2 Euro5 4WD
3.2 Euro5 4WD AT
3.2 4WD AT
3.2 AT
3.2 Euro5 AT
XTR 3.2
XTR 3.2 Euro5
XTR 3.2 4WD
XTR 3.2 Euro5 4WD
XTR 3.2 Euro5 4WD AT
XTR 3.2 4WD AT
XTR 3.2 Euro5 AT
XTR 3.2 AT
2.2 TDCi 130
2.2 TDCi 130 4x4
2.2 TDCi 160
2.2 TDCi 160 4x4
2.2 TDCi 160 AT
2.5
3.2 TDCi 4x4
3.2 TDCi 4x4 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score63%45%37%
Pros
  • Superb offroad capabilities
  • Good cargo capacity
  • Good offroad capabilities
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good I5 turbodiesel engine
  • Good fuel economy for its capacity
  • Superb offroad capabilities
  • Large loading capacity
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • High 0.40 drag coefficient
  • A bit down on power
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.