Compare Chevrolet Avalanche vs Dodge Dakota 3 vs Chevrolet SSR

Variants
5.3
8.1
3.7
3.7 4WD
3.7 4WD AT
3.7 AT
4.7
4.7 4WD
4.7 4WD AT
4.7 4WD AT
5.3 AT
6.0 MT
6.0 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
1161 L / 41.0 cu-ft ~ 1526 L / 53.9 cu-ft
1130 L / 39.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
144.0 L / 38.0 gal
83.0 L / 21.9 gal
95.0 L / 25.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
2

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Solid axle
Solid axle
Solid-axle
Tire Size
255/45 R19, 295/40 R20

Construction

Body Style
4-door Pickup
4-door Pickup
2-door Convertible Pickup

Dimensions

Size | Height
1869 mm / 73.6 in
1745 mm / 68.7 in
1631 mm / 64.2 in
Size | Length
5628 mm / 221.6 in
5558 mm / 218.8 in
4862 mm / 191.4 in
Size | Width
2026 mm / 79.8 in
1887 mm / 74.3 in
1996 mm / 78.6 in
Track Width | Front
1651.0 mm / 65.0 in
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
1628.0 mm / 64.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1676.0 mm / 66.0 in
1598.0 mm / 62.9 in
1648.0 mm / 64.9 in
Weight
3200.0 kg / 7054.8 lbs
2159.0 kg / 4759.8 lbs
Wheel Size
8J x 19, 10J x 20
Wheelbase
3302 mm / 130.0 in
3335 mm / 131.3 in
2946 mm / 116.0 in

Performance

Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
93.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.3:1
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V8 engine with 2 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V8 engine with 2 values per cylinder

Production

Availability
2001 ~ 2006
2005 ~ 2011

Reviews

Neofiliac score
71%
31%
79%
Pros
  • Exceptional powertrain
  • Great utility
  • Good offroad capabilities
  • Decent exterior design
  • Body-on-frame construction
  • RWD
  • Unique convertible-pickup concept
  • Superb drivetrain
Cons
  • Extra black plastic
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Poor offroad capabilities for a pickup
  • Not the best fit and finish
  • Poor offroad capabilities for a pickup
  • Very high fuel consumption

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.