Compare Dodge Dakota 3 vs Chevrolet SSR vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500 II Crew Cab

Variants
3.7
3.7 4WD
3.7 4WD AT
3.7 AT
4.7
4.7 4WD
4.7 4WD AT
4.7 4WD AT
5.3 AT
6.0 MT
6.0 AT
4.8
5.3
6.0

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
1130 L / 39.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
83.0 L / 21.9 gal
95.0 L / 25.1 gal
98.0 L / 25.9 gal
Passengers
5
2
4
Payload
1100 kg / 2425 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Drum
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Solid axle
Solid-axle
Solid axle
Tire Size
255/45 R19, 295/40 R20

Construction

Body Style
4-door Pickup
2-door Convertible Pickup
5-door Pickup

Dimensions

Size | Height
1745 mm / 68.7 in
1631 mm / 64.2 in
1956 mm / 77.0 in
Size | Length
5558 mm / 218.8 in
4862 mm / 191.4 in
6025 mm / 237.2 in
Size | Width
1887 mm / 74.3 in
1996 mm / 78.6 in
2024 mm / 79.7 in
Track Width | Front
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
1628.0 mm / 64.1 in
1730.0 mm / 68.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1598.0 mm / 62.9 in
1648.0 mm / 64.9 in
1702.0 mm / 67.0 in
Weight
3200.0 kg / 7054.8 lbs
2159.0 kg / 4759.8 lbs
2400.0 kg / 5291.1 lbs
Wheel Size
8J x 19, 10J x 20
Wheelbase
3335 mm / 131.3 in
2946 mm / 116.0 in
3886 mm / 153.0 in

Performance

Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
93.0 mm / 3.7 in
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.3:1
9.5:1
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V8 engine with 2 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2005 ~ 2011
2007 ~ 2014

Reviews

Neofiliac score
31%
79%
58%
Pros
  • Decent exterior design
  • Body-on-frame construction
  • RWD
  • Unique convertible-pickup concept
  • Superb drivetrain
  • Good offroad capability
  • Good towing capability
  • Superb drivetrain reliability
Cons
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Poor offroad capabilities for a pickup
  • Not the best fit and finish
  • Poor offroad capabilities for a pickup
  • Very high fuel consumption
  • High fuel consumption

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.