Compare Fiat Punto 199 vs Fiat Bravo 198 vs Fiat 500L Living

Variants
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
1.2 69
1.3 Multijet 85
1.3 Multijet 95
1.4 77
1.4 MultiAir 105
1.4 T-Jet 135
1.4
1.4 MultiAir
1.4 T-Jet 120
1.4 T-Jet 150
1.6 Multijet 105
1.6 Multijet 120
1.6 Multijet 90
1.9 MultiJet 120
1.9 MultiJet 150
2.0 Multijet
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 80
1.3 MultiJet II 85
1.4 T-Jet
1.6 MultiJet 105
1.6 MultiJet 120

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
400 L / 14.1 cu-ft ~ 1175 L / 41.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
57.0 L / 15.1 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
7
Payload
510 kg / 1124 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
205/55 R16, 225/45 R17
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
3/5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1498 mm / 59.0 in
1667 mm / 65.6 in
Size | Length
4065 mm / 160.0 in
4336 mm / 170.7 in
4352 mm / 171.3 in
Size | Width
1687 mm / 66.4 in
1792 mm / 70.6 in
1784 mm / 70.2 in
Track Width | Front
1473.0 mm / 58.0 in
1538.0 mm / 60.6 in
1522.0 mm / 59.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1466.0 mm / 57.7 in
1532.0 mm / 60.3 in
1519.0 mm / 59.8 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7J x 17
Wheelbase
2510 mm / 98.8 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2612 mm / 102.8 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.34
Towing Capacity
400 kg / 882 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1000 kg / 2205 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Transmission | Type
Manual

Reviews

Neofiliac score
16%
28%
22%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Small turning circle
  • Decent, punchy engines
  • Good manual transmission
  • Decent exterior design
  • Lots of interior space
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.