Compare Fiat 500e vs Citroen C1 3-door vs Fiat 500 facelift
Variants
1.0i
1.0i AT
1.0i AT
1.0i Euro5
1.4 HDi
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d
0.9 TwinAir 85 AT
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d AT
1.0 70
1.2 69
1.2 69 Euro6d
1.2 69 AT
1.2 69 Euro6d AT
1.3 MultiJet 95
1.4 MultiAir 135
1.4 MultiAir 135 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
198 L / 7.0 cu-ft
139 L / 4.9 cu-ft ~ 712 L / 25.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
Passengers
4
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 279.4x22.1 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 238.76x10.16 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent
Tire Size
Front wheel tires: 185/55 R15 Rear wheel tires: 185/55 R15
Turning Circle
9.5 m / 31.2 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
24.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
3-door battery-electric Hatchback
3-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
114 mm / 4.5 in
114 mm / 4.5 in
Size | Height
1527 mm / 60.1 in
Size | Length
3617 mm / 142.4 in
Size | Width
1628 mm / 64.1 in
Track Width | Front
1407.0 mm / 55.4 in
1415.0 mm / 55.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1397.0 mm / 55.0 in
Weight
1352.0 kg / 2980.7 lbs
Wheel Size
Front wheel rims: 5.5J x 15 Rear wheel rims: 6.5J x 15
Wheelbase
2301 mm / 90.6 in
2340 mm / 92.1 in
2300 mm / 90.6 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.311
0.362
Top Speed
142.0 km/h / 88.2 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Power
113 hp / 84.3 kW
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2013 ~ 2019
Reviews
Neofiliac score
15%
2%
25%
Pros
- Cute exterior design
- Small turning circle
- Small turning circle
- Easy to drive
- Great styling
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- No independent rear suspensions
- Very little cargo space
- Questionable battery degradation
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Horrible performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- High 0.36 drag coefficient
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.