HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Hyundai Accent 4 Hatchback vs Alfa Romeo MiTo facelift vs Hyundai Accent 5 Hatchback

Variants
1.6 GDi
1.6 GDi AT
1.6 MPi
1.6 MPi AT
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 85
1.4 70
1.4 78
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT
1.6 GDI
1.6 GDI AT
1.6 DPi
1.6 DPi CVT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
370 L / 13.1 cu-ft
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
616 L / 21.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
43.0 L / 11.4 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
421 kg / 928 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 256 mm
Ventilated discs
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 262 mm
Disc
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
8.4 m / 27.6 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1450 mm / 57.1 in
1446 mm / 56.9 in
1450 mm / 57.1 in
Size | Length
4115 mm / 162.0 in
4063 mm / 160.0 in
4185 mm / 164.8 in
Size | Width
1700 mm / 66.9 in
1720 mm / 67.7 in
1729 mm / 68.1 in
Track Width | Front
1483.0 mm / 58.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
Weight
1159.0 kg / 2555.2 lbs
Wheelbase
2570 mm / 101.2 in
2511 mm / 98.9 in
2580 mm / 101.6 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
77.0 mm / 3.0 in
75.6 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.2:1
Engine | Displacement
1.6 L / 97.1 cu-in / 1591.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
85.4 mm / 3.4 in
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2010 ~ 2018
2013 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
19%
23%
15%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • New 7-speed DCT
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Very small turning circle
Cons
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • More emission control systems to fail
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Bland in styling
  • Low build quality

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.