Compare Volkswagen Up vs SEAT Ibiza 4 vs Audi A1

Variants
1.0 60
1.0 60 AT
1.0 75
1.0 75 AT
1.0 CNG
1.0
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 110 DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.2 60
1.2 70
1.2 TDI
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 DSG
1.2 TSI 85
1.2 TSI 90
1.4 85
1.4 85 2012+
1.4 TDI 105
1.4 TDI 75
1.4 TDI 80
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 DSG
1.4 TSI 140
1.4 TSI 150
1.4 TSI 150 DSG
1.6
1.6 DSG
1.6 LPG
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DSG
1.9 TDI 105
1.9 TDI 90
2.0 TDI
1.2 TFSI
1.4 TFSI 122
1.4 TFSI 122 DCT
1.4 TFSI 140
1.4 TFSI 140 DCT
1.4 TFSI 185 DCT
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DCT
2.0 TDI

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
251 L / 8.9 cu-ft ~ 951 L / 33.6 cu-ft
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
3.4 L / 3.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
4
5
5
Payload
375 kg / 827 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
9.8 m / 32.1 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
3-5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1489 mm / 58.6 in
1416 mm / 55.7 in
Size | Length
3540 mm / 139.4 in
3954 mm / 155.7 in
Size | Width
1645 mm / 64.8 in
1693 mm / 66.7 in
1740 mm / 68.5 in
Track Width | Front
1428.0 mm / 56.2 in
1477.0 mm / 58.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1424.0 mm / 56.1 in
1471.0 mm / 57.9 in
Wheelbase
2420 mm / 95.3 in
2469 mm / 97.2 in
2469 mm / 97.2 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 5
Engine | Displacement
1.0 L / 61.0 cu-in / 999.0 cc
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-3 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
11%
16%
22%
Pros
  • Fuel efficient
  • Easy to drive and park
  • Small turning circle
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Better looking than the Sportback
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspension
  • Low cargo capacity

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.