Compare Ford Mondeo 2 Liftback vs Ford Fusion vs Ford Taurus 5

Variants
1.8 110
1.8 125
1.8 130
2.0 145
2.0 145 AT
2.0D 115
2.0D 115 AT
2.0D 90
2.0D 130
2.0D 130 AT
2.2D 155
2.5 170
2.5 170 AT
3.0 204
2.3
3.0
FWD
AWD

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
500 L / 17.7 cu-ft ~ 1370 L / 48.4 cu-ft
448 L / 15.8 cu-ft
600 L / 21.2 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
76.0 L / 20.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Helical spring
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/55 R16
205/60 R16
225/55 R18
Turning Circle
12.5 m / 41.0 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Liftback Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1429 mm / 56.3 in
1417 mm / 55.8 in
1562 mm / 61.5 in
Size | Length
4731 mm / 186.3 in
4831 mm / 190.2 in
5126 mm / 201.8 in
Size | Width
1812 mm / 71.3 in
1834 mm / 72.2 in
1892 mm / 74.5 in
Track Width | Front
1522.0 mm / 59.9 in
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
1633.0 mm / 64.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1537.0 mm / 60.5 in
1557.0 mm / 61.3 in
1636.0 mm / 64.4 in
Wheel Size
16 in
16 in
18 in
Wheelbase
2754 mm / 108.4 in
2728 mm / 107.4 in
2868 mm / 112.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.3
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
Duratec 35 (Cyclone)
Engine | Bore
92.5 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.3 cu-in / 3496.0 cc
Engine | Power
263.0 hp / 196.1 kW @ 6250 rpm
Engine | Redline
6700 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
75.2 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.7 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
338 Nm / 249.3 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2005 ~ 2009
2007 ~ 2009

Reviews

Neofiliac score
29%
8%
21%
Pros
  • Lots of room inside
  • Good value for money
  • Easy to work on
  • Handsome exterior design
  • Moved up in size class compared to Gen4
  • Comfortable ride
Cons
  • MacPherson strut front suspensions
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Uninspiring exterior and interior
  • Poor handling
  • Basic suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.