Compare Renault Twingo III vs Renault Zoe vs Renault Twingo III facelift

Variants
0.9 TCe
1.0 SCe
GT 0.9 TCe
GT 0.9 TCe AT
Q210
Q90
R110
R240
R75
R90 22kWh
R90 41kWh
0.9 TCe
0.9 TCe EDC
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 73
Z.E.

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
188 L / 6.6 cu-ft ~ 980 L / 34.6 cu-ft
338 L / 11.9 cu-ft ~ 1225 L / 43.3 cu-ft
174 L / 6.1 cu-ft ~ 980 L / 34.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
Passengers
4
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, De Dion
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.4 ft
8.8 m / 28.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door battery-electric Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
153 mm / 6.0 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1562 mm / 61.5 in
Size | Length
3595 mm / 141.5 in
4084 mm / 160.8 in
Size | Width
1730 mm / 68.1 in | 1945 mm / 76.6 in (mirror unfolded)
1646 mm / 64.8 in
Track Width | Front
1511.0 mm / 59.5 in
1452.0 mm / 57.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1425.0 mm / 56.1 in
Wheelbase
2492 mm / 98.1 in
2588 mm / 101.9 in
2492 mm / 98.1 in

Performance

Top Speed
135.0 km/h / 83.9 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Front-wheel drive
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
Engine | Bore
72.2 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Stroke
73.1 mm / 2.9 in
Transmission | Gears
1-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
26%
18%
3%
Pros
  • Interesting RWD setup
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Stylish design
  • Stylish design
  • Easy to drive and park in big cities
  • Very small turning circle
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Short electric range
  • Air-cooled battery
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Miserable electric range
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • The bus is much better

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.