HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Renault Grand Modus vs Renault Modus vs Citroen Grand C4 Picasso

Variants
1.2
1.2 TCe
1.5 dCi 103 AT
1.5 dCi 68
1.5 dCi 86 5MT
1.5 dCi 86 6MT
1.6 AT
1.2 TCe
1.2
1.4
1.5 dCi 103
1.5 dCi 106
1.5 dCi 68
1.5 dCi 86
1.6 112
1.6 112 AT
1.6 88
1.6 HDi 112 AT
1.6 HDi 109 6MT
1.6 HDi 109 5MT
1.6 HDi 109 AT
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 140 AT
1.6 150 AT
1.6 156 AT
1.6 120 Euro5
1.6 120
1.8 125
2.0 HDi 136 AT
2.0 HDi 150
2.0 HDi 150 AT
2.0 HDi 163 AT
2.0 140 4AT
2.0 140 6AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
305 L / 10.8 cu-ft ~ 1454 L / 51.3 cu-ft
208 L / 7.3 cu-ft ~ 1951 L / 68.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
51.0 L / 13.5 gal
49.0 L / 12.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
7

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1589 mm / 62.6 in
1589 mm / 62.6 in
1660 mm / 65.4 in
Size | Length
4034 mm / 158.8 in
4590 mm / 180.7 in
Size | Width
1709 mm / 67.3 in | 1960 mm / 77.2 in (mirror unfolded)
1830 mm / 72.0 in | 2100 mm / 82.7 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1472.0 mm / 58.0 in
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1450.0 mm / 57.1 in
1450.0 mm / 57.1 in
1539.0 mm / 60.6 in
Wheelbase
2575 mm / 101.4 in
2482 mm / 97.7 in
2728 mm / 107.4 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.31

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 4

Production

Availability
2004 ~ 2012

Reviews

Neofiliac score
3%
6%
24%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
  • More interior space than the Picasso
Cons
  • Very ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Rather bad design
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Rather uglier than the Picasso
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspension

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.