Compare Renault Grand Modus vs Renault Modus vs Nissan Cube 2

Variants
1.2
1.2 TCe
1.5 dCi 103 AT
1.5 dCi 68
1.5 dCi 86 5MT
1.5 dCi 86 6MT
1.6 AT
1.2 TCe
1.2
1.4
1.5 dCi 103
1.5 dCi 106
1.5 dCi 68
1.5 dCi 86
1.6 112
1.6 112 AT
1.6 88
1.4
1.5

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
305 L / 10.8 cu-ft ~ 1454 L / 51.3 cu-ft
1250 L / 44.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
51.0 L / 13.5 gal
49.0 L / 12.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
175/65 R14
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1589 mm / 62.6 in
1589 mm / 62.6 in
1645 mm / 64.8 in
Size | Length
4034 mm / 158.8 in
3900 mm / 153.5 in
Size | Width
1709 mm / 67.3 in | 1960 mm / 77.2 in (mirror unfolded)
1670 mm / 65.7 in
Track Width | Front
1472.0 mm / 58.0 in
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1450.0 mm / 57.1 in
1450.0 mm / 57.1 in
1465.0 mm / 57.7 in
Weight
1060.0 kg / 2336.9 lbs
Wheelbase
2575 mm / 101.4 in
2482 mm / 97.7 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 4
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.9:1
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder

Production

Availability
2004 ~ 2012
2002 ~ 2008

Reviews

Neofiliac score
3%
6%
6%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Very cute
  • Easy to park
  • Easy to maneuver in tight spaces
Cons
  • Very ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Rather bad design
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.