HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Renault Zoe vs Renault Clio IV vs Renault Twingo II

Variants
Q210
Q90
R110
R240
R75
R90 22kWh
R90 41kWh
0.9 90
0.9 TCe 90
0.9 TCe 75
1.2 120 AT
1.2 75 Euro6
1.2 75
1.2 TCe 120 AT
1.2 TCe 120
1.5 dCi 75
1.5 dCi 75 Euro6
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 90 AT
1.5 dCi 90 Euro6
1.5 dCi 90
RS 200 AT
RS 200 Euro6 AT
RS 220 AT
1.2 58
1.2 76
1.2 GT 100
1.2 75 Euro5
1.5 dCi 64
RS 1.6 133

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
338 L / 11.9 cu-ft ~ 1225 L / 43.3 cu-ft
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
Passengers
5
5
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door battery-electric Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1562 mm / 61.5 in
1448 mm / 57.0 in
Size | Length
4084 mm / 160.8 in
4062 mm / 159.9 in
Size | Width
1730 mm / 68.1 in | 1945 mm / 76.6 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1511.0 mm / 59.5 in
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
Wheelbase
2588 mm / 101.9 in
2589 mm / 101.9 in

Performance

Top Speed
135.0 km/h / 83.9 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual

Reviews

Neofiliac score
18%
16%
14%
Pros
  • Stylish design
  • Easy to drive and park in big cities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent styling
  • Small turning circle
  • Stylish design
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Short electric range
  • Air-cooled battery
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.