Compare Renault Clio III vs Peugeot 208 II vs Renault Zoe

Variants
1.2 59
1.2 75
1.2 75 AT
1.2 78 AT
1.2 TCe
1.2i 101
1.2i 65
1.4 98
1.5 dCi 105
1.5 dCi 68
1.5 dCi 75
1.5 dCi 86
1.5 dCi 86 AT
1.6 110
1.6 110 AT
1.6 88
2.0 138
2.0 138 AT
2.0 197
RS
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 75
e-208 50 kWh
1.2 PureTech 100 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 100
Q210
Q90
R110
R240
R75
R90 22kWh
R90 41kWh

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
338 L / 11.9 cu-ft ~ 1225 L / 43.3 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Elastic beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
10.5 m / 34.4 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
50.0 kWh (gross) | 46.0 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door battery-electric Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1430 mm / 56.3 in
1562 mm / 61.5 in
Size | Length
4055 mm / 159.6 in
4084 mm / 160.8 in
Size | Width
1730 mm / 68.1 in | 1945 mm / 76.6 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1500.0 mm / 59.1 in
1511.0 mm / 59.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1500.0 mm / 59.1 in
Wheelbase
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2588 mm / 101.9 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
37.1 m / 121.7 ft
CO2 Emission
137 g/km
Electric Range
350.0 km / 217.5 mi
Top Speed
135.0 km/h / 83.9 mph
Towing Capacity
535 kg / 1179 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 d-TEMP
Transmission | Gears
1-speed

Production

Availability
2019

Reviews

Neofiliac score
9%
16%
18%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Improved styling
  • Small turning circle
  • Stylish design
  • Easy to drive and park in big cities
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Unreliable transmissions
  • Horrible styling
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor build quality
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Short electric range
  • Air-cooled battery

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.