Compare Kia Picanto II 3-door vs Kia Rio III Hatchback
Variants
1.0 66
1.0 LPG
1.0 69
1.2 85 Euro6
1.2 85
1.2 85 AT
1.1 CRDi
1.1 CRDi Euro6
1.2 84
1.2 85
1.4 109
1.4 109 AT
1.4 109 Euro6
1.4 109 Euro6 AT
1.4 CDRi
1.4 CRDi Euro6
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
43.0 L / 11.4 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
185/65 R15, 195/55 R16, 205/45 R17
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
3-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Size | Height
1480 mm / 58.3 in
1455 mm / 57.3 in
Size | Length
3595 mm / 141.5 in
Wheelbase
2385 mm / 93.9 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
71.0 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Reviews
Neofiliac score
14%
24%
Pros
- Small turning circle
- Slightly better proportions than the 5-door Picanto
- Much improved exterior styling
- Low fuel consumption
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.