Compare Citroen C3 II vs Citroen C1 II 3-door vs Citroen C2

Variants
1.0 68
1.1 60
1.2 110
1.2 82
1.2 82 AT
1.4 95
1.4 95 AT
1.4 95 AT
1.4 e-HDi 68 AT
1.4 HDi 68
1.4 HDi 68 2013+
1.4i 73
1.6 120
1.6 120 2013+
1.6 120 AT
1.6 120 AT 2013+
1.6 BlueHDi 75
1.6 BlueHDI 99
1.6 e-HDI 114 AT
1.6 e-HDi 92
1.6 e-HDI 92 2013+
1.6 e-HDi 92 AT
1.6 e-HDI 92 AT 2013+
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.0 69
1.0 69 AT
1.2 82
1.0 72
1.0 72 Euro6d
1.1i
1.1i Euro4
1.4 HDi
1.4 HDi AT
1.4 HDi Euro4
1.4i 75
1.4i 75 AT
1.4i 90 AT
1.6i 110 AT
1.6 HDi 110
1.6i 110 AT
1.6i 125

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
196 L / 6.9 cu-ft ~ 780 L / 27.5 cu-ft
166 L / 5.9 cu-ft ~ 879 L / 31.0 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
3.6 L / 3.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
41.0 L / 10.8 gal
Passengers
5
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
9.6 m / 31.5 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1460 mm / 57.5 in
Size | Length
3941 mm / 155.2 in
3666 mm / 144.3 in
Size | Width
1615 mm / 63.6 in | 1884 mm / 74.2 in (mirror unfolded)
1659 mm / 65.3 in | 1898 mm / 74.7 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1425.0 mm / 56.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1420.0 mm / 55.9 in
Wheelbase
2466 mm / 97.1 in
2340 mm / 92.1 in
2315 mm / 91.1 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.31

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
5-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
13%
12%
3%
Pros
  • Good 0.29 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Small turning circle
  • Easy to drive and park
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Bug ugly
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Ugly

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.