Compare Citroen C3 II vs Citroen DS4 vs Citroen DS3

Variants
1.0 68
1.1 60
1.2 110
1.2 82
1.2 82 AT
1.4 95
1.4 95 AT
1.4 95 AT
1.4 e-HDi 68 AT
1.4 HDi 68
1.4 HDi 68 2013+
1.4i 73
1.6 120
1.6 120 2013+
1.6 120 AT
1.6 120 AT 2013+
1.6 BlueHDi 75
1.6 BlueHDI 99
1.6 e-HDI 114 AT
1.6 e-HDi 92
1.6 e-HDI 92 2013+
1.6 e-HDi 92 AT
1.6 e-HDI 92 AT 2013+
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.2 130
1.6 BlueHDi 120 AT
1.6 BlueHDi 120
1.6 e-HDi 112
1.6 e-HDi 112 AT
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 e-HDi 115 AT
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 THP 156
1.6 THP 163 AT
1.6 THP 165 AT
1.6 THP 200
1.6 VTi 120
2.0 BlueHDi 150
2.0 BlueHDi 181 AT
2.0 HDi 163
2.0 HDi 163 AT
1.2 e-VTi PureTech ETG
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 82
1.2 PureTech 82 ETG
1.4 e-HDi 70 ETG
1.4 HDi 70
1.4 VTi 95 ETG
1.4 VTi 95 GPL
1.4 VTi Airdream 95
1.6 BlueHDi 100
1.6 BlueHDi 120
1.6 e-HDi 110
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 e-HDi 90
1.6 e-HDi 90 ETG
1.6 HDi 110
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 165
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
Racing 1.6 T 202
Racing 1.6 T 207

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
385 L / 13.6 cu-ft ~ 1021 L / 36.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1533 mm / 60.4 in
Size | Length
3941 mm / 155.2 in
4275 mm / 168.3 in
Track Width | Front
1531.0 mm / 60.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Wheelbase
2466 mm / 97.1 in
2612 mm / 102.8 in
2464 mm / 97.0 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Reviews

Neofiliac score
13%
18%
21%
Pros
  • Good 0.29 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Less ugly than the C3
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Bug ugly
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.