Compare Citroen C3 II vs Citroen DS3 vs Citroen C3 III facelift
Variants
1.0 68
1.1 60
1.2 110
1.2 82
1.2 82 AT
1.4 95
1.4 95 AT
1.4 95 AT
1.4 e-HDi 68 AT
1.4 HDi 68
1.4 HDi 68 2013+
1.4i 73
1.6 120
1.6 120 2013+
1.6 120 AT
1.6 120 AT 2013+
1.6 BlueHDi 75
1.6 BlueHDI 99
1.6 e-HDI 114 AT
1.6 e-HDi 92
1.6 e-HDI 92 2013+
1.6 e-HDi 92 AT
1.6 e-HDI 92 AT 2013+
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.2 e-VTi PureTech ETG
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 82
1.2 PureTech 82 ETG
1.4 e-HDi 70 ETG
1.4 HDi 70
1.4 VTi 95 ETG
1.4 VTi 95 GPL
1.4 VTi Airdream 95
1.6 BlueHDi 100
1.6 BlueHDi 120
1.6 e-HDi 110
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 e-HDi 90
1.6 e-HDi 90 ETG
1.6 HDi 110
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 165
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
Racing 1.6 T 202
Racing 1.6 T 207
1.2 110
1.2 110 AT
1.2 83
1.5 HDi 102
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Construction
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Size | Height
1474 mm / 58.0 in
Size | Length
3941 mm / 155.2 in
3996 mm / 157.3 in
Size | Width
1749 mm / 68.9 in | 2007 mm / 79.0 in (mirror unfolded) | 1829 mm / 72.0 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1471.0 mm / 57.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1471.0 mm / 57.9 in
Wheel Size
15 in, 16 in, 17 in
Wheelbase
2466 mm / 97.1 in
2464 mm / 97.0 in
2539 mm / 100.0 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
13%
21%
8%
Pros
- Good 0.29 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Less ugly than the C3
- Low fuel consumption
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Bug ugly
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Horrible performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.