HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Citroen C2 vs Citroen C3 III facelift vs Citroen C4 Coupe

Variants
1.1i
1.1i Euro4
1.4 HDi
1.4 HDi AT
1.4 HDi Euro4
1.4i 75
1.4i 75 AT
1.4i 90 AT
1.6i 110 AT
1.6 HDi 110
1.6i 110 AT
1.6i 125
1.2 110
1.2 110 AT
1.2 83
1.5 HDi 102
1.4 88
1.6 HDi 109
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 THP
1.6 VTi
1.6 VTi AT
1.6
1.6 AT
2.0 HDi 136
2.0 HDi 136 AT
2.0 HDi 140
2.0
VTS 2.0

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
166 L / 5.9 cu-ft ~ 879 L / 31.0 cu-ft
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
41.0 L / 10.8 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Construction

Body Style
3-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
3-door Coupe

Dimensions

Size | Height
1474 mm / 58.0 in
1456 mm / 57.3 in
Size | Length
3666 mm / 144.3 in
3996 mm / 157.3 in
Size | Width
1659 mm / 65.3 in | 1898 mm / 74.7 in (mirror unfolded)
1749 mm / 68.9 in | 2007 mm / 79.0 in (mirror unfolded) | 1829 mm / 72.0 in (mirror folded)
1769 mm / 69.6 in | 1964 mm / 77.3 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1471.0 mm / 57.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1471.0 mm / 57.9 in
1502.0 mm / 59.1 in
Wheel Size
15 in, 16 in, 17 in
Wheelbase
2315 mm / 91.1 in
2539 mm / 100.0 in
2608 mm / 102.7 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
0.28

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Transmission | Gears
5-speed

Production

Availability
2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
3%
8%
13%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Easy to drive and park
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Ugly
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.