HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Mazda 2 III vs Mazda 2 II vs Alfa Romeo MiTo facelift

Variants
1.5 SkyActiv-D
1.5 SkyActiv-G 115
1.5 SkyActiv-G 75
1.5 SkyActiv-G 90
1.5 SkyActiv-G 90 AT
1.3 75
1.3 75 Euro5
1.3 84
1.3 86
1.4 CD
1.5 102
1.5 102 AT
1.5 103
1.5 103 AT
1.6 CD 90
1.6 CD 95
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 85
1.4 70
1.4 78
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
280 L / 9.9 cu-ft ~ 950 L / 33.5 cu-ft
250 L / 8.8 cu-ft ~ 787 L / 27.8 cu-ft
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
44.0 L / 11.6 gal
43.0 L / 11.4 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
9.8 m / 32.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
143 mm / 5.6 in
150 mm / 5.9 in
Size | Height
1495 mm / 58.9 in
1446 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4060 mm / 159.8 in
4063 mm / 160.0 in
Size | Width
1695 mm / 66.7 in | 1983 mm / 78.1 in (mirror unfolded)
1720 mm / 67.7 in
Track Width | Front
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
1483.0 mm / 58.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1485.0 mm / 58.5 in
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
Wheelbase
2570 mm / 101.2 in
2490 mm / 98.0 in
2511 mm / 98.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
0.31
Towing Capacity
515 kg / 1135 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1100 kg / 2425 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6

Production

Availability
2013 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
26%
6%
23%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Very low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Small turning circle
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Semi-independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • More emission control systems to fail

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.