Compare Chevrolet Bolt EV vs Chevrolet Spark EV vs Chevrolet Sonic 2 facelift

Variants
60 kWh
66 kWh
1.4
1.4 AT
1.8
1.8 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
478 L / 16.9 cu-ft ~ 1603 L / 56.6 cu-ft
272 L / 9.6 cu-ft ~ 663 L / 23.4 cu-ft
539 L / 19.0 cu-ft ~ 1351 L / 47.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
46.0 L / 12.2 gal
Passengers
5
4
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 276 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 264 mm
Disc
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
215/50 R17
185/55 R15, 195/55 R15
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
10.3 m / 33.8 ft
10.5 m / 34.4 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
21.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
350.0 V
Body Style
5-door battery-electric Hatchback
5-door battery-electric Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1590 mm / 62.6 in
1506 mm / 59.3 in
Size | Length
4166 mm / 164.0 in
3721 mm / 146.5 in
4059 mm / 159.8 in
Size | Width
1765 mm / 69.5 in
1626 mm / 64.0 in
1735 mm / 68.3 in
Track Width | Front
1501.0 mm / 59.1 in
1410.0 mm / 55.5 in
1509.0 mm / 59.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1501.0 mm / 59.1 in
1392.0 mm / 54.8 in
1509.0 mm / 59.4 in
Weight
1616.0 kg / 3562.7 lbs
1300.0 kg / 2866.0 lbs
Wheel Size
15 in
Wheelbase
2375 mm / 93.5 in
2525 mm / 99.4 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
7.6 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
6.5 sec
7.2 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.308
0.33
Top Speed
145.0 km/h / 90.1 mph
145.0 km/h / 90.1 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Power
200 hp / 149.1 kW
143 hp / 106.6 kW
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic

Production

Availability
2013 ~ 2016

Reviews

Neofiliac score
17%
6%
20%
Pros
  • Notable improvement in range
  • Small turning circle
  • Cute EV
  • Decent exterior design
  • OKish engine reliability
Cons
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Ugly
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Horrible range
  • Poor battery degradation
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Nasty interior

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.