HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Nissan Leaf vs Nissan Note vs Alfa Romeo MiTo facelift

Variants
24 kWh
24 kWh 2012+
30 kWh
1.4 88
1.4 88 2010+
1.5 dCi 68
1.5 dCi 86
1.5 dCi 90
1.6 110
1.6 110 AT
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 85
1.4 70
1.4 78
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
46.0 L / 12.2 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Transverse stabilizer, Torsion
Rigid axle
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
360.0 V
Body Style
5-door battery-electric Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
160 mm / 6.3 in
Size | Height
1550 mm / 61.0 in
1550 mm / 61.0 in
1446 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4445 mm / 175.0 in
4063 mm / 160.0 in
Size | Width
1770 mm / 69.7 in | 1967 mm / 77.4 in (mirror unfolded)
1690 mm / 66.5 in
1720 mm / 67.7 in
Track Width | Front
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
1483.0 mm / 58.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
1460.0 mm / 57.5 in
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
Wheel Size
15 in, 16 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2511 mm / 98.9 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
ZEV
Euro 5
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2013 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
2%
4%
23%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
  • Engine reliability and repair-ability are fine
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Disastrous battery degradation
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Barely acceptable electric range
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Rigid rear axle
  • No powerful engine options
  • Tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • More emission control systems to fail

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.