Compare SEAT Ibiza 5 vs Kia Forte II Hatchback vs Kia Rio II Hatchback

Variants
1.0 TSI 115
1.0 TSI 115 Euro6d
1.0 TSI 115 DSG
1.0 TSI 115 Euro6d DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 65
1.0 75
1.0 80
1.0 80 Euro6d
1.0 TGI 90 CNG
1.0 TGI 90 CNG
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
1.5 TSI 150
1.6 110
1.6 110 AT
1.6 90
1.6 TDI 80
1.6 TDI 95
1.6 TDI 95 Euro6d
1.6 TDI 95 DSG
1.6 GDi AT
2.0 GDi
2.0 GDi AT
1.4
1.4 AT
1.5 CRDi
1.6
1.6 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
657 L / 23.2 cu-ft
272 L / 9.6 cu-ft ~ 1107 L / 39.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
175/70 R14
Turning Circle
9.8 m / 32.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
155 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height
1444 mm / 56.9 in
1450 mm / 57.1 in
1470 mm / 57.9 in
Size | Length
4059 mm / 159.8 in
4350 mm / 171.3 in
3990 mm / 157.1 in
Size | Width
1780 mm / 70.1 in | 1942 mm / 76.5 in (mirror unfolded)
1780 mm / 70.1 in
1695 mm / 66.7 in
Track Width | Front
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
1460.0 mm / 57.5 in
Wheelbase
2564 mm / 100.9 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2500 mm / 98.4 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.32

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4

Production

Availability
2017 ~ 2018
2005 ~ 2009

Reviews

Neofiliac score
17%
14%
12%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • More coherent design than Mk4
  • More spacious than Cee'd
  • Clean design
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.