Compare Seat Leon 3 (5F)

Seat Leon 3 (5F)

Seat Leon 3 (5F)
Variants
1.0 TSI 115
1.0 TSI 115 DSG
1.0 TSI 86
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 DSG
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 110 DSG
1.2 TSI 86
1.4 TGI 110
1.4 TGI 110 CNG
1.4 TGI 110 CNG DSG
1.4 TSI 122
1.4 TSI 125
1.4 TSI 140
1.4 TSI 150
1.4 TSI 150 DSG
1.5 TGI 130
1.5 TGI 130 DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 105 DSG
1.6 TDI 110
1.6 TDI 115
1.6 TDI 115 DSG
1.6 TDI 90
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 150 Euro6
2.0 TDI 150 Euro6 DSG
2.0 TDI 184
2.0 TDI 184 DSG
2.0 TSI 190 DSG
Cupra 2.0 TSI 265
Cupra 2.0 TSI 265 DSG
Cupra 2.0 TSI 280
Cupra 2.0 TSI 280 DSG
Cupra 2.0 TSI 290
Cupra 2.0 TSI 290 DSG
Cupra 2.0 TSI 300
Cupra 2.0 TSI 300 DSG
Cupra R 2.0 TSI 310

Reviews

Neofiliac score24%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Looks fine from some angles
Cons
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove

Related Products

Dodge Caliber
Dodge Caliber 2006
  • Unique design (though not pretty)
  • SRT-4
· 27%
Volvo V40
Volvo V40 2012
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Good design from many angles
  • Good transmissions
...
· 35%
Chrysler PT Cruiser
Chrysler PT Cruiser 2000
  • So ugly that it's an icon
· 2%
Kia Forte / K3 II (YD)
Kia Forte / K3 II (YD) 2012
  • More spacious than Cee'd
  • Clean design
· 14%
Citroen C4
Citroen C4 2004
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Decent engine reliability
· 16%
Opel Astra K / Vauxhall Astra / Holden Astra (B16)
Opel Astra K / Vauxhall Astra / Holden Astra (B16) 2015
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
· 24%
Citroen C4 Coupe
Citroen C4 Coupe 2004
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
· 13%
Chevrolet Cruze (J300)
Chevrolet Cruze (J300) 2009
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Rather good automatic transmissions
· 19%
Citroen C4 II
Citroen C4 II 2010
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Slightly better automatic transmission
· 13%
Skoda Rapid Spaceback (NH1)
Skoda Rapid Spaceback (NH1) 2013
  • Low official fuel consumption
· 8%
Honda Civic 9 (FK)
Honda Civic 9 (FK) 2012
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Sweet manual transmission
· 49%
Chevrolet Cruze 2 (D2LC)
Chevrolet Cruze 2 (D2LC) 2017
  • Slightly improved styling
  • Good fuel economy ratings
· 20%
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.