HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare SEAT Toledo 4 vs Audi A3 8V Sedan facelift vs SEAT Toledo 4

Variants
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 95
1.2
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 85
1.2 TSI 90
1.4 TDI
1.4 TDI DSG
1.4 TSI 122 DSG
1.4 TSI 125 DSG
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 115
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DSG
1.0 TFSI
1.0 TFSI S-tronic
1.4 TFSI
1.4 TFSI S-tronic
1.5 TFSI
1.5 TFSI S-tronic
1.6 TDI
1.6 TDI S-tronic
2.0 TDI 150hp
2.0 TDI 150hp quattro
2.0 TDI 150hp S-tronic
2.0 TDI 184hp quattro S-tronic
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI quattro S-tronic
2.0 TFSI S-tronic
30 TDI
30 TDI S-tronic
30 TFSI
30 TFSI S-tronic
35 TDI S-tronic
35 TFSI
35 TFSI S-tronic
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 95
1.2
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 85
1.2 TSI 90
1.4 TDI
1.4 TDI DSG
1.4 TSI 122 DSG
1.4 TSI 125 DSG
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 115
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DSG

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
10.2 m / 33.5 ft
10.2 m / 33.5 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1461 mm / 57.5 in
1416 mm / 55.7 in
1461 mm / 57.5 in
Size | Length
4482 mm / 176.5 in
4458 mm / 175.5 in
4482 mm / 176.5 in
Size | Width
1706 mm / 67.2 in
1796 mm / 70.7 in | 1960 mm / 77.2 in (mirror unfolded)
1706 mm / 67.2 in
Track Width | Front
1463.0 mm / 57.6 in
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
1463.0 mm / 57.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1500.0 mm / 59.1 in
1526.0 mm / 60.1 in
1500.0 mm / 59.1 in
Wheelbase
2602 mm / 102.4 in
2637 mm / 103.8 in
2602 mm / 102.4 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 6

Reviews

Neofiliac score
13%
45%
13%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Improved DSG transmission
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 3.7L/100km fuel consumption
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Improved DSG transmission
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • Stuck with semi-independent suspensions in the rear
  • Questionable styling
  • Confusing new nomenclature
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • Stuck with semi-independent suspensions in the rear

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.