HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare SEAT Ibiza 4 vs Volkswagen Up vs Volkswagen Cross Polo 5

Variants
1.0
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 110 DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.2 60
1.2 70
1.2 TDI
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 DSG
1.2 TSI 85
1.2 TSI 90
1.4 85
1.4 85 2012+
1.4 TDI 105
1.4 TDI 75
1.4 TDI 80
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 DSG
1.4 TSI 140
1.4 TSI 150
1.4 TSI 150 DSG
1.6
1.6 DSG
1.6 LPG
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DSG
1.9 TDI 105
1.9 TDI 90
2.0 TDI
1.0 60
1.0 60 AT
1.0 75
1.0 75 AT
1.0 CNG
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DCT
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 110 DCT
1.2 TSI 90
1.2 TSI 90 DCT
1.4 85
1.4 85 DCT
1.4 TDI 105
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 DCT
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
251 L / 8.9 cu-ft ~ 951 L / 33.6 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
3.4 L / 3.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
4
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
215/40 R17
Turning Circle
9.8 m / 32.1 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
3-5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
175 mm / 6.9 in
Size | Height
1489 mm / 58.6 in
1488 mm / 58.6 in
Size | Length
3540 mm / 139.4 in
3987 mm / 157.0 in
Size | Width
1693 mm / 66.7 in
1645 mm / 64.8 in
Track Width | Front
1428.0 mm / 56.2 in
1454.0 mm / 57.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1424.0 mm / 56.1 in
1453.0 mm / 57.2 in
Wheel Size
7.5J x 17
Wheelbase
2469 mm / 97.2 in
2420 mm / 95.3 in
2469 mm / 97.2 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Displacement
1.0 L / 61.0 cu-in / 999.0 cc
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-3 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
16%
11%
6%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Fuel efficient
  • Easy to drive and park
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.