Compare Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift vs Mini Hatch R56 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift 2

Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift

Mini Hatch R56

Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift 2

Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) faceliftMini Hatch R56Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift 2
Variants
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 85
1.4 70
1.4 78
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT
Cooper 122PS
Cooper 122PS AT
Cooper 120PS
Cooper D 110PS
Cooper D 110PS AT
Cooper D 112PS
Cooper D 112PS AT
Cooper S 184PS
Cooper S 184PS AT
Cooper S 175PS
Cooper SD
Cooper SD AT
JCW
One 75PS
One MINIMALIST 75PS
One 98PS
One 98PS AT
One MINIMALIST 98PS
One D
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 95
1.4
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT

Reviews

Neofiliac score23%26%23%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Iconic design
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • More emission control systems to fail
  • No powerful engine options
  • Unreliable small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.