Compare Mercedes-Benz A-Class W169 vs Alfa Romeo Giulietta (940) vs Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift

Mercedes-Benz A-Class W169

Alfa Romeo Giulietta (940)

Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift

Mercedes-Benz A-Class W169Alfa Romeo Giulietta (940)Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift
Variants
A 150
A 150 CVT
A 160 CDI
A 160 CDI CVT
A 170
A 170 CVT
A 180 CDI
A 180 CDI CVT
A 200
A 200 CDI
A 200 CDI CVT
A 200 CVT
A 200 Turbo
A 200 Turbo CVT
1.4 TB 105
1.4 MultiAir 170 TCT
1.4 TB 120
1.4 TB MultiAir 170
1.6 MultiJet 105
1.750 TBi
2.0 MultiJet 140
2.0 MultiJet 150
2.0 MultiJet 170
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 85
1.4 70
1.4 78
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT

Reviews

Neofiliac score1%52%23%
Pros
  • Three-pointed star
  • Exceptionally sexy design
  • Sweet engines
  • Good manual transmission
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Poor engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • CVT
  • Exceptionally ugly
  • Great insult to the Mercedes name
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Limited to I4 engines
  • No powerful engine options
  • Tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • More emission control systems to fail

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.