Compare Mercedes-Benz A-Class W169 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift vs Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift 2

Mercedes-Benz A-Class W169

Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift

Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift 2

Mercedes-Benz A-Class W169Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) faceliftAlfa Romeo MiTo (955) facelift 2
Variants
A 150
A 150 CVT
A 160 CDI
A 160 CDI CVT
A 170
A 170 CVT
A 180 CDI
A 180 CDI CVT
A 200
A 200 CDI
A 200 CDI CVT
A 200 CVT
A 200 Turbo
A 200 Turbo CVT
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 85
1.4 70
1.4 78
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 95
1.4
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT

Reviews

Neofiliac score1%23%23%
Pros
  • Three-pointed star
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Poor engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • CVT
  • Exceptionally ugly
  • Great insult to the Mercedes name
  • No powerful engine options
  • Tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • More emission control systems to fail
  • No powerful engine options
  • Tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.