Compare Peugeot 2008 (A94) vs Mazda CX-3 (DK)

Peugeot 2008 (A94)

Mazda CX-3 (DK)

Peugeot 2008 (A94)Mazda CX-3 (DK)
Variants
1.2 e-HTP
1.2 e-VTi AT
1.2 VTi
1.4 HDi
1.6 BlueHDi
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 e-HDi 92
1.6 e-HDi 92 AT
1.6 VTi
1.5d
1.5d 4WD
1.5d AWD AT
1.8 Skyactiv-D
1.8 Skyactiv-D AWD
1.8 Skyactiv-D AT
2.0 Skyactiv-G 121
2.0 Skyactiv-G 121 AT
2.0 Skyactiv-G 148 AT
2.0 Skyactiv-G 150 AWD
2.0 Skyactiv-G 150 AWD AT
2.0i
2.0i AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score2%23%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Easy to fix
  • Decent engine reliability
Cons
  • Very ugly indeed
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.