Compare Volvo XC60 II (SPA) vs Ford Escape 4 / Kuga 3 vs Ford Kuga 2 / Escape 3 (C520)

Volvo XC60 II (SPA)

Ford Escape 4 / Kuga 3

Ford Kuga 2 / Escape 3 (C520)

Volvo XC60 II (SPA)Ford Escape 4 / Kuga 3Ford Kuga 2 / Escape 3 (C520)
Variants
T4
T5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
D4 AWD
D4
D5 AWD
T8 Polestar
1.5 EcoBlue 120
1.5 EcoBlue 120 AT
1.5 EcoBoost 120
1.5 EcoBoost 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
2.5 Duratec 190 AWD CVT
2.5 Duratec 225 PHEV CVT
1.5 120
1.5 150
1.5 182 4x4 AT
1.5 TDCI 120
1.5 TDCI 120 AT
1.6 150
1.6 150 4x4 AT
1.6 182 4x4 AT
2.0 242 4x4 AT
2.0 TDCi 140
2.0 TDCi 140 4x4
2.0 TDCi 140 4x4 AT
2.0 TDCI 150
2.0 TDCI 150 4x4
2.0 TDCI 150 4x4 AT
2.0 TDCi 163 4x4
2.0 TDCi 163 4x4 AT
2.0 TDCI 180 4x4
2.0 TDCI 180 4x4 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score57%17%19%
Pros
  • Much improved design
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Wonderful interior appointments
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Cheap to purchase
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable engines
  • PHEV nonsense
  • Crossover nonsense
  • PHEV nonsense
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Uglier than the original
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.