Compare Chevrolet Traverse vs Chevrolet Trax vs Chevrolet Traverse 2
Variants
281 AWD
281 FWD
288 AWD
288 FWD
1.4 AT
1.4 AWD AT
1.4 Turbo AWD
1.6
1.7D
1.7D AT
1.7D AWD
2.0
3.6
3.6 AWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
651 L / 23.0 cu-ft ~ 2781 L / 98.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
11.2 L / 11.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.2 L / 5.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
83.3 L / 22.0 gal
Passengers
5
Payload
504 kg / 1111 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 331 mm
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Multi-link
Tire Size
245/70 R17, 255/65 R18, 255/55 R20
205/70 R16
225/65 R18, 255/55 R20
Turning Circle
12.3 m / 40.3 ft
11.9 m / 39.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
183 mm / 7.2 in
157 mm / 6.2 in
Size | Height
1795 mm / 70.7 in
Size | Length
5189 mm / 204.3 in
Size | Width
1996 mm / 78.6 in
Track Width | Front
1709.0 mm / 67.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1702.0 mm / 67.0 in
Weight
1978.0 kg / 4360.7 lbs
Wheel Size
7J x 17, 7.5J x 18, 8J x 20
16 in
18 in, 20 in
Wheelbase
2555 mm / 100.6 in
3071 mm / 120.9 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
2358 kg / 5199 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
2268 kg / 5000 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.5:1
Engine | Displacement
3.6 L / 217.5 cu-in / 3564.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
85.6 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
9-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Hydra-Matic 6T75
Automatic Hydra-Matic
Production
Availability
2009 ~ 2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
21%
23%
40%
Pros
- High cargo capacity
- Rather reliable powertrain
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Good exterior styling
- High cargo capacity
- Lots of space inside
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Very bland, unfinished styling
- Somewhat ugly
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Basic suspension setup
- Average handling
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.