Compare Chevrolet Traverse vs Opel Antara vs Opel Crossland facelift
Variants
281 AWD
281 FWD
288 AWD
288 FWD
2.0 CDTI 127
2.2 CDTI 163 AT
2.2 CDTI 163 AWD AT
2.2 CDTI 163 AWD
2.2 CDTI 184 AWD AT
2.2 CDTI 184 AWD
2.2 CDTI 184
2.2 CDTI 184 AT
2.4 167 AWD
2.4 167 AWD AT
2.4 167
2.4 167 AT
2.4 150
2.4 150 AT
3.2 227
1.2
1.2 Turbo 110
1.2 Turbo 130
1.2 Turbo 130 AT
1.5d 110
1.5d 120 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
410 L / 14.5 cu-ft ~ 1255 L / 44.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
11.2 L / 11.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.2 L / 5.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
83.3 L / 22.0 gal
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Ventilated discs
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 331 mm
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Trailing arm
Semi-independent
Tire Size
245/70 R17, 255/65 R18, 255/55 R20
225/70 R16
Turning Circle
12.3 m / 40.3 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
183 mm / 7.2 in
Size | Height
1605 mm / 63.2 in
Size | Length
4217 mm / 166.0 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in
1976 mm / 77.8 in (mirror unfolded) | 1825 mm / 71.9 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1518.0 mm / 59.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1491.0 mm / 58.7 in
Wheel Size
7J x 17, 7.5J x 18, 8J x 20
16 in
Wheelbase
2707 mm / 106.6 in
2604 mm / 102.5 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
2358 kg / 5199 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Displacement
3.6 L / 217.5 cu-in / 3564.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
85.6 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Hydra-Matic 6T75
Production
Availability
2009 ~ 2017
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
21%
19%
14%
Pros
- High cargo capacity
- Rather reliable powertrain
- Not the worst vehicle on the market
- Low fuel consumption
- Cheap to purchase
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Very bland, unfinished styling
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup
- Horrible performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Poor suspension setup
- Only available with tiny engines
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.