Compare Seat Ibiza 4 ST vs Peugeot 207 SW facelift vs Peugeot 508 SW

Seat Ibiza 4 (6P) ST Station Wagon (2010-2017)

Peugeot 207 SW facelift Station Wagon (2009-2013)

Peugeot 508 SW Station Wagon (2010-2014)

SEAT | Cars

Peugeot | Cars

Variants

1.0

1.0 TSI 110

1.0 TSI 110 DSG

1.0 TSI 95

1.2 60

1.2 70

1.2 TDI

1.2 TSI 105

1.2 TSI 105 DSG

1.2 TSI 85

1.2 TSI 90

1.4

1.4 TSI

1.4 TDI 105

1.4 TDI 75

1.4 TDI 90

1.4 TDI 90 DSG

1.4 TSI 140

1.6 TDI 105

1.6 TDI 90

1.6 TDI 90 DSG

FR 1.4 TSI DSG

1.4

1.4 VTi

1.6 HDi 109PS

1.6 HDi 112PS

1.6 HDi 90PS

1.6 HDi 92PS

1.6 VTi

1.6 VTi AT

1.6 e-HDi

1.6 HDi

1.6 THP

1.6 THP AT

1.6 VTi

2.0 HDi 140PS

2.0 HDi 163PS

2.0 HDi 163PS AT

2.2 HDi AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

430 L / 15.2 cu-ft

337 L / 11.9 cu-ft ~ 1258 L / 44.4 cu-ft

560 L / 19.8 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

45.0 L / 11.9 gal

50.0 L / 13.2 gal

72.0 L / 19.0 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Semi-independent, coil spring

Multi-link

Turning Circle

10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Body Style

5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Size | Height

1527 mm / 60.1 in

1476 mm / 58.1 in

Size | Length

4164 mm / 163.9 in

4813 mm / 189.5 in

Size | Width

1693 mm / 66.7 in

1748 mm / 68.8 in | 1972 mm / 77.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 1818 mm / 71.6 in (mirror folded)

1920 mm / 75.6 in

Track Width | Front

1465.0 mm / 57.7 in

1467.0 mm / 57.8 in

Track Width | Rear

1457.0 mm / 57.4 in

1461.0 mm / 57.5 in

Wheelbase

2469 mm / 97.2 in

2540 mm / 100.0 in

2817 mm / 110.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.3

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 5

Production

Availability

2009 ~ 2013

2010 ~ 2014

Reviews

Neofiliac score

21%

Pros

Low officiall fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Small turning circle
Slightly cleaner design

Much better-looking than the 407 SW

Cons

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions

Horrible 0-100kph time
Can't even reach 200km/h
Miserably low engine output
Only available with small engines
Not independent suspensions
Very ugly

Bad 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.