Compare Seat Ibiza 4 ST vs Renault Talisman Grandtour vs Renault Clio 4 Estate

Seat Ibiza 4 (6P) ST Station Wagon (2010-2017)

Renault Talisman Grandtour Station Wagon (2016-2022)

Renault Clio 4 Estate (KH) Station Wagon (2013-2016)

SEAT | Cars

Renault | Cars

Variants

1.0

1.0 TSI 110

1.0 TSI 110 DSG

1.0 TSI 95

1.2 60

1.2 70

1.2 TDI

1.2 TSI 105

1.2 TSI 105 DSG

1.2 TSI 85

1.2 TSI 90

1.4

1.4 TSI

1.4 TDI 105

1.4 TDI 75

1.4 TDI 90

1.4 TDI 90 DSG

1.4 TSI 140

1.6 TDI 105

1.6 TDI 90

1.6 TDI 90 DSG

FR 1.4 TSI DSG

1.3 TCe 4CONTROL AT

1.3 TCe AT

1.5 ENERGY dCi 110PS

1.6 ENERGY dCi 130PS

1.6 ENERGY dCi 130PS AT

1.6 ENERGY dCi 160PS AT

1.6 ENERGY TCe 150PS AT

1.6 ENERGY TCe 200PS AT

1.7 Blue dCi 150PS

1.7 Blue dCi 150PS 4CONTROL

1.8 TCe 225PS 4CONTROL AT

1.8 TCe 225PS AT

2.0 Blue dCi 160PS 4CONTROL AT

2.0 Blue dCi 160PS AT

2.0 Blue dCi 200PS 4CONTROL AT

2.0 Blue dCi 200PS AT

0.9 Energy TCe

1.2

1.2 TCe AT

1.5 dCi

1.5 dCi AT

1.5 Energy dCi

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

430 L / 15.2 cu-ft

Coolant Capacity

5.0 L / 5.3 qt

Fuel Capacity

45.0 L / 11.9 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Drum

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Semi-independent

Turning Circle

10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style

5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

145 mm / 5.7 in

Size | Height

1465 mm / 57.7 in

1445 mm / 56.9 in

Size | Length

4866 mm / 191.6 in

4267 mm / 168.0 in

Size | Width

1693 mm / 66.7 in

1870 mm / 73.6 in | 2081 mm / 81.9 in (mirror unfolded) | 1890 mm / 74.4 in (mirror folded)

1732 mm / 68.2 in

Track Width | Front

1465.0 mm / 57.7 in

1614.0 mm / 63.5 in

Track Width | Rear

1457.0 mm / 57.4 in

1609.0 mm / 63.3 in

Wheelbase

2469 mm / 97.2 in

2809 mm / 110.6 in

2589 mm / 101.9 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 5

Production

Availability

2013 ~ 2016

Reviews

Neofiliac score

21%

Pros

Low officiall fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Very low official fuel consumption
Looks better than the car is

Low official fuel consumption

Cons

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspension

Horrible 0-100kph time
Can't even reach 200km/h
Miserably low engine output
Only available with tiny engines
Not even fully independent suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.