Compare Seat Leon 3 ST vs Peugeot 207 SW facelift vs Seat Ibiza 4 ST

Variants
1.0 EcoTSI 115
1.0 TSI 115
1.0 TSI 115 DSG
1.0 TSI 86
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 110 DSG
1.2 TSI 86
1.4 TGI 110 CNG
1.4 TGI 110 CNG DSG
1.4 TSI (150 Hp) ACT start/stop
1.4 TSI 125
1.4 TSI 150 ACT
1.4 TSI 150 ACT DSG
1.5 EcoTSI 130
1.5 EcoTSI 150
1.5 EcoTSI 150 DSG
1.5 TGI 130
1.5 TGI 130 DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 105 AWD
1.6 TDI 105 DSG
1.6 TDI 110
1.6 TDI 115
1.6 TDI 115 AWD
1.6 TDI 115 DSG
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 Euro6
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 110
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 184
2.0 TDI 184 DSG
2.0 TSI 190 DSG
Cupra 2.0 TSI 265
Cupra 2.0 TSI 265 DSG
Cupra 2.0 TSI 280
Cupra 2.0 TSI 280 DSG
Cupra 2.0 TSI 290
Cupra 2.0 TSI 290 DSG
Cupra 2.0 TSI 300
Cupra 2.0 TSI 300 AWD DSG
Cupra 2.0 TSI 300 DSG
1.4
1.4 VTi
1.6 HDi 109PS
1.6 HDi 112PS
1.6 HDi 90PS
1.6 HDi 92PS
1.6 VTi
1.6 VTi AT
1.0
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 110 DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.2 60
1.2 70
1.2 TDI
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 DSG
1.2 TSI 85
1.2 TSI 90
1.4
1.4 TSI
1.4 TDI 105
1.4 TDI 75
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 DSG
1.4 TSI 140
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DSG
FR 1.4 TSI DSG

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
337 L / 11.9 cu-ft ~ 1258 L / 44.4 cu-ft
430 L / 15.2 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Size | Height
1527 mm / 60.1 in
Size | Length
4164 mm / 163.9 in
Size | Width
1748 mm / 68.8 in | 1972 mm / 77.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 1818 mm / 71.6 in (mirror folded)
1693 mm / 66.7 in
Track Width | Front
1467.0 mm / 57.8 in
1465.0 mm / 57.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1461.0 mm / 57.5 in
1457.0 mm / 57.4 in
Wheelbase
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2469 mm / 97.2 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.3

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Production

Availability
2009 ~ 2013

Reviews

Neofiliac score
24%
3%
2%
Pros
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Small turning circle
  • Slightly cleaner design
  • Low officiall fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Semi-independent suspensions on FWD models
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Not independent suspensions
  • Very ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.