HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Chevrolet HHR vs Opel Astra J Sports Tourer vs Fiat Tipo Wagon

Variants
2.2
2.2 AT
2.4
2.4 AT
1.3 CDTI
1.4
1.4 87PS
1.4 LPG 140PS
1.4 Turbo 120PS
1.4 Turbo 140PS
1.4 Turbo 140PS AT
1.6 5MT
1.6 6MT
1.6 AT
1.6 CDTI 110PS
1.6 CDTI 136PS
1.6 Turbo
1.6 Turbo 170PS
1.6 Turbo 170PS AT
1.6 Turbo 180PS
1.6 Turbo AT
1.7 CDTI 100PS
1.7 CDTI 110PS
1.7 CDTI 110PS ecoFLEX
1.7 CDTI 125PS
1.7 CDTI 130PS
1.7 CDTI 130PS ecoFLEX
2.0 CDTI 160PS
2.0 CDTI 160PS AT
2.0 CDTI 165PS
2.0 CDTI 165PS AT
2.0 CDTI BiTurbo
1.3 16V MultiJet II
1.3 16V MultiJet II Euro6d
1.4 16V FIRE
1.4 16V FIRE Euro6d
1.4 16V T-Jet EasyPower
1.4 16V T-Jet EasyPower
1.6 16V E.torQ AT
1.6 16V MultiJet II
1.6 16V MultiJet II DDCT
1.6 16V MultiJet II Euro6d
1.6 16V MultiJet II Euro6d DCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
638 L / 22.5 cu-ft ~ 1785 L / 63.0 cu-ft
550 L / 19.4 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
49.0 L / 12.9 gal
56.0 L / 14.8 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
215/55 R16
205/55 R16, 225/40 R18
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Size | Height
1603 mm / 63.1 in
1535 mm / 60.4 in
Size | Length
4475 mm / 176.2 in
4698 mm / 185.0 in
4571 mm / 180.0 in
Size | Width
1755 mm / 69.1 in
1792 mm / 70.6 in
Track Width | Front
1491.0 mm / 58.7 in
1542.0 mm / 60.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1491.0 mm / 58.7 in
1543.0 mm / 60.7 in
Wheel Size
6.5J X 16
16 in, 18 in
Wheelbase
2628 mm / 103.5 in
2685 mm / 105.7 in
2638 mm / 103.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.33

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5

Production

Availability
2005 ~ 2011

Reviews

Neofiliac score
1%
18%
24%
Pros
  • Nothing
  • Rather handsome
  • Lots of engine options
  • Down to very low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Exceptionally ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • No independent suspensions
  • Outdated transmissions
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Only available with small engines
  • Semi-independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspension

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.