Compare Chevrolet HHR vs Opel Astra H Caravan vs Fiat Tipo Wagon
Variants
2.2
2.2 AT
2.4
2.4 AT
1.3 CDTI
1.4
1.6
1.6 ecoFLEX LPG
1.6 AT
1.7 CDTI 100PS
1.7 CDTI 125PS
1.7 CDTI 80PS
1.7 CDTI ecoFLEX
1.8
1.8 AT
1.9 CDTI 120PS
1.9 CDTI 120PS AT
1.9 CDTI 150PS
2.0 Turbo 170PS
2.0 Turbo 200PS
1.3 16V MultiJet II
1.3 16V MultiJet II Euro6d
1.4 16V FIRE
1.4 16V FIRE Euro6d
1.4 16V T-Jet EasyPower
1.4 16V T-Jet EasyPower
1.6 16V E.torQ AT
1.6 16V MultiJet II
1.6 16V MultiJet II DDCT
1.6 16V MultiJet II Euro6d
1.6 16V MultiJet II Euro6d DCT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
638 L / 22.5 cu-ft ~ 1785 L / 63.0 cu-ft
550 L / 19.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.0 L / 7.4 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
49.0 L / 12.9 gal
52.0 L / 13.7 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
215/55 R16
205/55 R16, 225/40 R18
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
160 mm / 6.3 in
Size | Height
1603 mm / 63.1 in
1500 mm / 59.1 in
Size | Length
4475 mm / 176.2 in
4515 mm / 177.8 in
4571 mm / 180.0 in
Size | Width
1755 mm / 69.1 in
1792 mm / 70.6 in
Track Width | Front
1491.0 mm / 58.7 in
1488.0 mm / 58.6 in
1542.0 mm / 60.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1491.0 mm / 58.7 in
1488.0 mm / 58.6 in
1543.0 mm / 60.7 in
Wheel Size
6.5J X 16
16 in, 18 in
Wheelbase
2628 mm / 103.5 in
2703 mm / 106.4 in
2638 mm / 103.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
Towing Capacity
720 kg / 1587 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1400 kg / 3086 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Production
Availability
2005 ~ 2011
Reviews
Neofiliac score
1%
18%
24%
Pros
- Nothing
- Rather good-looking
- Widely available with manual transmission
- Down to very low official fuel consumption
Cons
- Exceptionally ugly
- No powerful engine options
- No independent suspensions
- Outdated transmissions
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Semi-independent suspension
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspension
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.