Compare Kia Ceed 3 Sportswagon vs Kia Cee'd SW vs Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon
Variants
1.0 T-GDI
1.4
1.4 T-GDI
1.4 T-GDI DCT
1.6 CRDi 115PS
1.6 CRDi 115PS DCT
1.6 CRDi 136PS
1.6 CRDi 136PS DCT
1.6 GDi PHEV DCT
1.4
1.4 CVVT
1.6 CRDi 115PS
1.6 CRDi 115PS AT
1.6 CRDi 128PS
1.6 CRDi 128PS AT
1.6 CRDi 90PS 5MT
1.6 CRDi 90PS 6MT
1.6 CVVT
1.6 CVVT AT
1.6D
1.6D AT
2.0 CRDi 140PS
2.0 CVVT
2.0 CVVT AT
1.75 TBi
1.8 MPI
1.9 JTDM 16V
1.9 JTDM 16V AT
1.9 JTDM 8V
1.9 JTS
2.0 JTDM 136PS
2.0 JTDM 170PS
2.2 JTS
2.2 JTS Selespeed
2.4 JTDM 200PS
2.4 JTDM 200PS AT
2.4 JTDM 210PS
2.4 JTDM 210PS Q4
3.2 V6 JTS
3.2 V6 JTS Q4
3.2 V6 JTS Q4 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
534 L / 18.9 cu-ft ~ 1664 L / 58.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
5.8 L / 6.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
3.8 L / 4.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
504 kg / 1111 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 305x25 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 284x10 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
8.9 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-polymer
Battery | Voltage
360.0 V
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Size | Height
1465 mm / 57.7 in
1417 mm / 55.8 in
Size | Length
4470 mm / 176.0 in
4660 mm / 183.5 in
Size | Width
1790 mm / 70.5 in
1828 mm / 72.0 in
Track Width | Front
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
1578.0 mm / 62.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
Weight
1458.0 kg / 3214.3 lbs
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
10.8 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
10.5 sec
CO2 Emission
28 ~ 30 g/km
Electric Range
55.0 km / 34.2 mi
Fuel Economy
1.1 L/100km / 213.8 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
171.0 km/h / 106.3 mph, 120.0 km/h / 74.6 mph (EV mode)
Towing Capacity
600 kg / 1323 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1300 kg / 2866 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Reviews
Neofiliac score
39%
26%
46%
Pros
- Down to very low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Small turning circle
- Multi-link suspensions all-around
- Potent engines
- Still elegant
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- MacPherson front suspension
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Not as good-looking as the sedan
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.