HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Kia Ceed 3 Sportswagon vs Toyota Auris 2 Touring Sports vs Toyota Caldina 3

Variants
1.0 T-GDI
1.4
1.4 T-GDI
1.4 T-GDI DCT
1.6 CRDi 115PS
1.6 CRDi 115PS DCT
1.6 CRDi 136PS
1.6 CRDi 136PS DCT
1.6 GDi PHEV DCT
1.3 Dual VVT-i
1.4 D-4D
1.6 Valvematic
1.8 VVT-i Hybrid
2.0 D-4D
1.8
2.0
2.0 AWD
2.0 GT-FOUR

Capacity

Coolant Capacity
5.8 L / 6.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
3.8 L / 4.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
504 kg / 1111 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 305x25 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 284x10 mm
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
195/65 R15
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
10.8 m / 35.4 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
8.9 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-polymer
Battery | Voltage
360.0 V
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Size | Height
1465 mm / 57.7 in
1460 mm / 57.5 in
1445 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4560 mm / 179.5 in
4510 mm / 177.6 in
Size | Width
1760 mm / 69.3 in
1740 mm / 68.5 in
Track Width | Front
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
1500.0 mm / 59.1 in
Weight
1458.0 kg / 3214.3 lbs
1240.0 kg / 2733.7 lbs
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
10.8 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
10.5 sec
CO2 Emission
28 ~ 30 g/km
88 g/km
Electric Range
55.0 km / 34.2 mi
Fuel Economy
1.1 L/100km / 213.8 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
171.0 km/h / 106.3 mph, 120.0 km/h / 74.6 mph (EV mode)
Towing Capacity
600 kg / 1323 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1300 kg / 2866 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5 J
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Automatic

Production

Availability
2012 ~ 2015
2002 ~ 2007

Reviews

Neofiliac score
39%
28%
17%
Pros
  • Down to very low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Good for fuel costs
  • Small turning circle
  • Reliable drivetrain
  • Rather potent GT-Four version
  • Clean and elegant styling
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • MacPherson front suspension
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Only available with small engines
  • Basic suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.