Compare Kia Cee'd SW vs Ford Mondeo 2 Wagon vs Ford Mondeo 4 Wagon

Variants
1.4
1.4 CVVT
1.6 CRDi 115PS
1.6 CRDi 115PS AT
1.6 CRDi 128PS
1.6 CRDi 128PS AT
1.6 CRDi 90PS 5MT
1.6 CRDi 90PS 6MT
1.6 CVVT
1.6 CVVT AT
1.6D
1.6D AT
2.0 CRDi 140PS
2.0 CVVT
2.0 CVVT AT
1.8 110PS
1.8 125PS
2.0 145PS
2.0 145PS AT
2.0 TDCi 130PS
2.0 TDCi 130PS AT
2.0D 115PS
2.0D 115PS AT
2.0D 90PS
2.2 TDCi 155PS
2.5 170PS
2.5 170PS AT
3.0 204PS
ST220
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 EcoBoost
1.5 EcoBoost AT
1.5 TDCi
1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
1.6 TDCi
1.6 TDCi ECOnetic
2.0 EcoBoost 203PS AT
2.0 EcoBoost 240PS AT
2.0 TDCi 150PS
2.0 TDCi 150PS AWD
2.0 TDCi 150PS ECOnetic
2.0 TDCi 150PS AT
2.0 TDCi 180PS
2.0 TDCi 180PS ECOnetic
2.0 TDCi 180PS AT
2.0 TDCi 180PS AWD AT
2.0 TDCi 210PS AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
534 L / 18.9 cu-ft ~ 1664 L / 58.8 cu-ft
540 L / 19.1 cu-ft ~ 1700 L / 60.0 cu-ft
488 L / 17.2 cu-ft ~ 1585 L / 56.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
62.5 L / 16.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Helical spring
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/60 R16, 235/50 R17, 235/45 R18, 235/40 R19
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
128 mm / 5.0 in
Size | Height
1441 mm / 56.7 in
1501 mm / 59.1 in
Size | Length
4470 mm / 176.0 in
4804 mm / 189.1 in
4867 mm / 191.6 in
Size | Width
1790 mm / 70.5 in
1812 mm / 71.3 in
Track Width | Front
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
1522.0 mm / 59.9 in
1599.0 mm / 63.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
1537.0 mm / 60.5 in
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheel Size
16 in
6.5J x 16, 7.5J x 17, 8J x 18, 8J x 19
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2754 mm / 108.4 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
26%
23%
32%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Clean and simple styling
  • Decent reliability record
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Improved styling
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Engines are too small
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.