HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Citroen C5 CrossTourer vs Citroen C3 Picasso facelift vs Kia Carnival 4

Variants
2.0 BlueHDi 150hp
2.0 BlueHDi 180hp AT
2.0 HDi
2.0 HDi AT
2.2 HDi AT
1.2 PureTech
1.4 VTi
1.6 BlueHDi
1.6 e-HDi AT
1.6 HDi 114PS
1.6 HDi 92PS
1.6 VTi
1.6 VTi AT
2.2d 11 Seat
2.2d 7 Seat
2.2d 9 Seat
3.5 11 Seat
3.5 7 Seat
3.5 9 Seat

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
505 L / 17.8 cu-ft ~ 1462 L / 51.6 cu-ft
385 L / 13.6 cu-ft ~ 1506 L / 53.2 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
71.0 L / 18.8 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Column-Mounted Electric Power steering
Steering Ratio
14.23:1
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link
Tire Size
245/45 R18, 245/40 R19
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.4 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Minivan
Platform
Hyundai-Kia N3

Dimensions

Size | Height
1479 mm / 58.2 in
1631 mm / 64.2 in
1740 mm / 68.5 in
Size | Length
4840 mm / 190.6 in
5155 mm / 203.0 in
Size | Width
1860 mm / 73.2 in | 2096 mm / 82.5 in (mirror unfolded)
1766 mm / 69.5 in | 2050 mm / 80.7 in (mirror unfolded)
1995 mm / 78.5 in
Track Width | Front
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1557.0 mm / 61.3 in
Wheel Size
18 in, 19 in
Wheelbase
2815 mm / 110.8 in
2540 mm / 100.0 in
3090 mm / 121.7 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.308

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
85.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Type
Turbocharged commonrail diesel inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2020
Debut
2021-02-23
Made In
Korea

Reviews

Neofiliac score
37%
2%
55%
Pros
  • Doesn't pretend to go offroad
  • Rather fine styling
  • Multi-link suspensions all-around
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Good styling
  • Large interior space
  • Great comfort
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Semi-independent rear suspension
  • Poor handling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.