Compare Citroen C3 Picasso vs Renault Grand Espace 4 vs Renault Modus

Renault Grand Espace 4 Minivan (2002-2014)

Citroen | Cars

Renault | Cars

Variants

1.4 VTi

1.4 VTi Euro5

1.4 VTi LPG

1.6 e-HDi

1.6 HDi 109PS

1.6 HDi 112PS

1.6 HDi 90PS

1.6 VTi 115PS

1.6 VTi 120PS

1.9 dCi

2.0 dCi 130

2.0 dCi 131

2.0 dCi 150

2.0 dCi 150 Euro5

2.0 dCi 150 Euro5 AT

2.0 dCi 150 AT

2.0 dCi 173

2.0 dCi 173 Euro5

2.0 dCi 173 AT

2.0 TCe 170

2.0 TCe 170 Euro5

2.0 TCe 170 AT

2.0 Turbo 163

2.0 Turbo 163 AT

2.0 Turbo 170

2.0 Turbo 170 AT

2.2 dCi 139 AT

2.2 dCi 150

2.2 dCi 150 AT

3.0 dCi 177 AT

3.0 dCi 181 AT

3.5 AT

3.5 Euro3 AT

1.2 TCe

1.2

1.4

1.5 dCi 103

1.5 dCi 106

1.5 dCi 68

1.5 dCi 86

1.6 112

1.6 112 AT

1.6 88

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

456 L / 16.1 cu-ft ~ 3050 L / 107.7 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

83.0 L / 21.9 gal

49.0 L / 12.9 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent, coil spring

Semi-independent

Semi-independent, coil spring

Turning Circle

10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style

5-door Station Wagon

5-door Minivan

5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

120 mm / 4.7 in

Size | Height

1669 mm / 65.7 in

1589 mm / 62.6 in

Size | Length

4078 mm / 160.6 in

Size | Width

1766 mm / 69.5 in | 2050 mm / 80.7 in (mirror unfolded)

Track Width | Front

1466.0 mm / 57.7 in

1574.0 mm / 62.0 in

Track Width | Rear

1465.0 mm / 57.7 in

1556.0 mm / 61.3 in

1450.0 mm / 57.1 in

Wheelbase

2540 mm / 100.0 in

2482 mm / 97.7 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.308

0.35

Towing Capacity

750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2000 kg / 4409 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 4

Reviews

Neofiliac score

31%

Pros

Easy to fix

Very high cargo capacity
Good towing capacity
Lots of space inside

Small turning circle
Low fuel consumption

Cons

Horrible 0-100kph time
Can't even reach 200km/h
Miserably low engine output
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions
Very ugly

Bad 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options
No independent rear suspensions

Rather bad design
Horrible 0-100kph time
Can't even reach 200km/h
Miserably low engine output
Only available with tiny engines
No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.