Compare Citroen C3 Picasso vs Honda Odyssey 3 vs Honda Mobilio

Variants
1.4 VTi
1.4 VTi Euro5
1.4 VTi LPG
1.6 e-HDi
1.6 HDi 109PS
1.6 HDi 112PS
1.6 HDi 90PS
1.6 VTi 115PS
1.6 VTi 120PS
FWD
AWD
1.5 90
1.5 110
1.5 90 4WD

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
280 L / 9.9 cu-ft ~ 1235 L / 43.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
42.0 L / 11.1 gal
Passengers
5
7
7
Payload
1200 kg / 2646 lbs
275 kg / 606 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Tire Size
215/60 R16
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1669 mm / 65.7 in
1550 mm / 61.0 in
1705 mm / 67.1 in
Size | Length
4078 mm / 160.6 in
4770 mm / 187.8 in
Size | Width
1766 mm / 69.5 in | 2050 mm / 80.7 in (mirror unfolded)
1800 mm / 70.9 in
Track Width | Front
1466.0 mm / 57.7 in
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
1460.0 mm / 57.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1465.0 mm / 57.7 in
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
1440.0 mm / 56.7 in
Weight
1600.0 kg / 3527.4 lbs
Wheel Size
6J x 16
5.5J x 14
Wheelbase
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2830 mm / 111.4 in
2740 mm / 107.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.308
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
160.0 km/h / 99.4 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
K24
Engine | Bore
87.0 mm / 3.4 in
73.0 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.7:1
Engine | Displacement
2.4 L / 143.7 cu-in / 2354.0 cc
1.5 L / 91.3 cu-in / 1496.0 cc
Engine | Power
160.0 hp / 119.3 kW @ 5500 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
68.0 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
99.0 mm / 3.9 in
89.4 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Torque
218 Nm / 160.8 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
CVT

Production

Availability
2004 ~ 2010

Reviews

Neofiliac score
2%
49%
21%
Pros
  • Easy to fix
  • Superb drivetrain reliability
  • Beautiful design
  • Lots of interior space
  • Handsome exterior design
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Very ugly
  • Uninspiring
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • CVT

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.