Compare Renault Talisman Grandtour vs Renault Megane 2 Grand Tour vs Renault Laguna 2 Estate
Variants
1.3 TCe 4CONTROL AT
1.3 TCe AT
1.5 ENERGY dCi 110PS
1.6 ENERGY dCi 130PS
1.6 ENERGY dCi 130PS AT
1.6 ENERGY dCi 160PS AT
1.6 ENERGY TCe 150PS AT
1.6 ENERGY TCe 200PS AT
1.7 Blue dCi 150PS
1.7 Blue dCi 150PS 4CONTROL
1.8 TCe 225PS 4CONTROL AT
1.8 TCe 225PS AT
2.0 Blue dCi 160PS 4CONTROL AT
2.0 Blue dCi 160PS AT
2.0 Blue dCi 200PS 4CONTROL AT
2.0 Blue dCi 200PS AT
1.4 98PS
1.5 dCi 100PS
1.5 dCi 100PS AT
1.5 dCi 106PS
1.5 dCi 82PS
1.5 dCi 86PS
1.6 112PS
1.6 112PS AT
1.6 113PS
1.6 113PS AT
1.9 dCi 110PS
1.9 dCi 120PS
1.9 dCi 130PS
1.9 dCi 90PS
2.0 135PS
1.5 dCi 101PS
1.5 dCi 105PS
1.5 dCi 82PS
1.5 dCi 82PS Euro4
1.6 107PS
1.6 112PS
1.8 120PS
1.9 dCi 100PS
1.9 dCi 107PS
1.9 dCi 120PS
2.0 136PS
GT
2.0 Turbo 170PS
2.0 Turbo 165PS
2.0 IDE 140PS
2.2 dCi 150PS
2.2 dCi 150PS AT
3.0 207PS
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
520 L / 18.4 cu-ft ~ 1600 L / 56.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent rear suspension
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
145 mm / 5.7 in
Size | Height
1465 mm / 57.7 in
1467 mm / 57.8 in
1443 mm / 56.8 in
Size | Length
4866 mm / 191.6 in
4500 mm / 177.2 in
4695 mm / 184.8 in
Size | Width
1870 mm / 73.6 in | 2081 mm / 81.9 in (mirror unfolded) | 1890 mm / 74.4 in (mirror folded)
1777 mm / 70.0 in | 2026 mm / 79.8 in (mirror unfolded)
1772 mm / 69.8 in
Track Width | Front
1614.0 mm / 63.5 in
1518.0 mm / 59.8 in
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1609.0 mm / 63.3 in
1514.0 mm / 59.6 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Wheelbase
2809 mm / 110.6 in
2686 mm / 105.7 in
2740 mm / 107.9 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Reviews
Neofiliac score
21%
13%
10%
Pros
- Very low official fuel consumption
- Looks better than the car is
- Much better looking than the sedan
- Card key that allowed the owner to show off at the time
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspension
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- No fully independent suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.