Compare Mazda 6 III / Atenza (GJ) facelift vs Mazda 6 II / Atenza (GH) vs Mazda 6 III / Atenza (GJ) facelift

Mazda 6 III / Atenza (GJ) facelift

Mazda 6 II / Atenza (GH)

Mazda 6 III / Atenza (GJ) facelift

Mazda 6 III / Atenza (GJ) faceliftMazda 6 II / Atenza (GH)Mazda 6 III / Atenza (GJ) facelift
Variants
2.0 Skyactiv-G 145PS
2.0 Skyactiv-G 165PS
2.0 Skyactiv-G 165PS AT
2.2 Skyactiv-D 150PS
2.2 Skyactiv-D 150PS 4x4
2.2 Skyactiv-D 150PS AT
2.2 Skyactiv-D 175PS
2.2 Skyactiv-D 175PS 4x4 AT
2.2 Skyactiv-D 175PS AT
2.5 Skyactiv-G AT
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0 CD 140PS
2.2 CD 163PS
2.2 CD 185PS
2.5
2.0 Skyactiv-G 145PS
2.0 Skyactiv-G 165PS
2.0 Skyactiv-G 165PS AT
2.2 Skyactiv-D 150PS
2.2 Skyactiv-D 150PS 4x4
2.2 Skyactiv-D 150PS AT
2.2 Skyactiv-D 175PS
2.2 Skyactiv-D 175PS 4x4 AT
2.2 Skyactiv-D 175PS AT
2.5 Skyactiv-G AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score30%42%30%
Pros
  • Handsome styling
  • Great engine lineup
  • 6-speed manual widely available
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Good engline reliability
  • Improved interior
  • Handsome styling
  • Great engine lineup
  • 6-speed manual widely available
Cons
  • MacPherson front suspension
  • No real improvement over pre-facelift
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Slightly less beautiful than Mk1
  • MacPherson front suspension
  • No real improvement over pre-facelift

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.